July 8, 2018 Rosemary O’Hara – Editorial Page Editor The Sun Sentinel

July 8, 2018

Rosemary O’Hara – Editorial Page Editor

The Sun Sentinel

RE: Some comments on your Woe is me. Alas & Alack and the sky is really, really falling this time editorial on that old, reliable modern American Liberal chestnut stare decisis. And speaking of turds in the punch bowl, would it make me a cad to point out that on Page 3B – local news – you have a news story with the come-hither headline “Man Indicted for Murder of his Unborn Child”?

Ms O’Hara,

All hail Justice Ginsburg!

Senator Patrick Leahy – [D-VT] – the ohmadanish & hypocritical R.R.C. [Retired Roman Catholic] had an intriguing colloquy with RBG during her confirmation process. “If I ask you about Roe v Wade you won’t tell me, will you?”, asked this Granite State buffoon. “That’s right. I won’t”, replied the nominee.

She later said that she was “sorry” that the Supreme Court had decided Roe v Wade. She wished the political process had been allowed to play out. Perhaps, she thought, that might have tempered the ongoing cantankerous acrimony.

A brief digression:

“Black Lives Matter” turns a blind eye to Chicago, the charnel house by Lake Michigan, the Illinois abattoir when it comes to Blacks killing Blacks. I guess Black on Black killing is easy to condone if you are faced with the God-awful number of abortions performed on Black women since Roe v Wade. Between 35% and 40% of the abortions since 1973 have been performed on women of color. As many as 25 million – that’s 25,000,000 – Willie Hortons, Maxine Waters, O.J. Simpsons, Andre Watts, Colin Kaepernicks, Herman Cains, H. Rap Browns, and Thomas Sowells have gone down the drain. If that ain’t racial genocide what the hell is?

Meanwhile, back to your editorial.

“Under Chief Justice John Roberts, the Court has demonstrated an emphatic disregard for precedents.” Do you mean bad precedents like Plessy v Ferguson or good precedents like Roe v Wade? Who gets to pick and choose the good from the bad or as Juvenal said, Quis custodes ipso custodiet?”

By the by, the Dred Scott decision was overturned on the field of battle, remember? Meanwhile, back to Page 3B, Local News. The headline reads

“Grand Jury Indicts Man for Death of his Unborn Child”

Assuming Roe v Wade is still valid when the perpetrator – alleged, of course, alleged – goes to trial he can claim that it is not murder since the government has acquiesced in 60 million – that’s 60,000,000 – such procedures since 1973.

Jumping back to why Roman Catholic modern American Liberal politicians have a chiropractor on speed dial it is because their backs are always disjointed. While it is very easy to have your cake and eat it, it is impossible to eat your cake and have it. In a Logical construct that would shame wily Jesuits, the Governors Cuomo, pere et fils, both proclaim their personal opposition to abortion but say that their hands were and are tied because public policy takes precedence. To which an observer might add that Thomas More addressed that choice when he said just before his head was chopped off. “When a statesman forsakes his private conscience for his public duties he leads his country on a short path to chaos”.

It is safe to say that the Cuomos, if Dred Scott were to have been captured in New York state on a fugitive warrant, both of them would have slapped his felonious Black ass on the midnight train to Georgia, right quick.

Did not candidate Trump promise to nominate people to the Supreme Court who traveled within certain navigational buoys so clearly and repeatedly laid down and lighted by him? Maybe the Russkies convinced Hillary not to campaign in Ohio, in Michigan, in Wisconsin. Trump made a promise. Unlike “I will never send American boys to fight in foreign wars” – 1916, 1940, 1964 – or “I will balance the budget” FDR, 1932 or “If you like your doctor you can keep him” or “I will draw a red line in the sand over poison gas”. 

He is keeping the promise he made

Ideas and elections have consequences.

Kevin Smith

WARRIORBARDIT@BELLSOUTH.NET

PS – Speaking of the Supreme Court…did I ever tell you that I am responsible for Justice Thomas? In the middle of a 7b year trial in US Tax Court my wife and I joined a petition on a procedural matter wending its way through the Federal Courts. The tradition in the Supreme Court is when the verdict is unanimous the Senior Justice has the option of writing the opinion. Justice Marshall, surely the best trial lawyer in the 20^th century ever to sit with the Supremes, exercised that option. As he signed it he noticed my name was on it. Realizing that there were no more worlds to conquer he resigned. The next day Judge Thomas was nominated. Ergo….